Video Transcript: Acts 8
Announcer - This is Dr. Craig Keener. In his teaching on the book of Acts, this is session number 11 on Acts 8.
Dr. Keener – In Acts 7, Stephen lays the theological groundwork for the mission away from Jerusalem or beyond Jerusalem and Judea. But Philip is the first one, to begin to officially carry it out. Now actually, there were many people were scattered. And we read in chapter 11, that many of them were taking the good news with them. But Phillip is the one who's narrated. He's one of the seven, one of the leaders of the Hellenist Jewish Christian movement. And so in chapter 8:5-25, we see Philip's mission to Samaria. And verses 26-40 is ministry to an African court official.
We'll start with 8:5-13, the conversion of Samaria. Chapter 8:5, speaks of a Samaritan city, probably it's referring to the main Samaritan city, Neapolis, which was on the site of ancient Schechem, probably not the site of the ancient city of Samaria, which no longer was a Samaritan city, it had become a predominantly Greek city. And then refounded as a Greek city. So probably Neapolis on the site of ancient Shechem. Shechem, which actually does figure in Stephen's retelling of Israel's history back in chapter 7:15-16. Well, many people are coming to faith, but one of the people that he runs into there is Simon the sorcerer. Now, Gentiles used magic a lot. It was popular in love. You had love magic, to try to seduce people to like you to charm them into maybe leaving their spouse and coming after you to burn with passion for you, and so on. It's also used in sports, where you would use magic to try to kill your opponents with curses, and make their chariots crash and so on where if you were rooting for a particular team, you would do that. So magic was very widely used. In Egypt in particular, we have a lot of evidence for it because, well, we have a lot of papyrii from Egypt, and there are a lot of magical papyrii.
But Jewish practitioners were sometimes considered some of the best at magic, that despite the fact that some Jewish teachers said that magic is very bad, you're not supposed to do it. Many of the rabbis said well, you have to make a difference between illusions. Just magic tricks in one hand, are what you do by means of spirits, demons. And that may have been a good distinction to make. But some, even though rabbis condemned magic, we see some later rabbis doing something that really kind of looked like magic trying to use the secrets of creation to create the hind part of a calf, and, and things like that. The reason that Jewish people were well known for magic was that magic often worked by invoking the name of a higher spirit to deal with a lower spirit. And Jewish people were reputed to know the secret name of their deity. Because Yahweh what we really had, YHWH the letters, we didn't have the vowels to go with it. And so consequently, it was just a tradition of how it was pronounced because Jewish people normally didn't pronounce the sacred name in public anymore. They called him Lord, rather than Yahweh. So it was considered a secret name. And in magic, sometimes people will try every possible permutation of how to pronounce that divine name. Although some of the things that people have thought were just permutations of the divine name. The vowels were also used for for magic, so sometimes people are just choosing different vowels.
But in any case, Jewish practitioners of magic were, were highly reputed. You see a Jewish magician, Jewish false prophet, in Acts 13. Do you see the seven sons of Sceva who are exorcists, but what they're doing with similar to practices in ancient magic. And you have people who weren't Jewish trying to use the name of the Jewish deity, in invoking angels and so forth. In any case, Simon, in the Samaritan town has gained a lot of notoriety from the practice of magic. Now, Sebaste was nearby. Sebaste, probably our closest equivalent today might be something like Augusta. Sebaste was a Greek city, founded in the site of ancient Samaria, and Sebaste meant the august one, it was it was named after the title of the Emperor. And in this Greek city, we have evidence of what was actually going on in some other places, too, but was going on there as well. That many were blending all the male deities into one kind of synthesis of the male deity. But with the dyad, all the female deities into a female deity. Justin Martyr, who's actually from Neapolis, in the second century, what's called Nablus today in the second century, Justin Martyr was a Gentile from the Samaritan area, though he wasn't Samaritan by religion. He later became a Christian by the time he's writing his Christian. He says that the reputation there, the tradition there was that Simon was being portrayed as the incarnation of the male deity. And his consort, Helena, was being portrayed as the Incarnation, with the avatar, the female deity. We don't we don't know if that tradition goes back to the first century, but but it could well, he's from the right region to, to know something about that. And that would make some sense, because in this passage, it says that he claims to be the great power of God. Now remember, that there are people in Acts who claimed to be somebody. Gamaliel said that Theudas claimed to be somebody. And in Acts 12, Herod Agrippa I wants to receive worship as a deity. By contrast, Peter rejects veneration Acts 3:12. And also, in Acts 10, Paul rejects veneration Paul and Barnabas reject veneration and Acts 14. But here is somebody who wants wants to be exalted. What did Jesus say, in Luke's gospel, whoever seeks to exalt themselves will be brought low, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
Well, the Samaritans are baptized by Philip, they were already circumcised. So the issue of whether you have to circumcise them wouldn't come up the way it could come up later on with Gentiles. But Samaritans, if they converted to Judaism, would have converted to Judaism by baptism alone, because they, you didn't re-circumcise somebody unless they become uncircumcised, for which there actually was a medical procedure back then. Some Jewish people who became very Hellenized in the Maccabean era, and wanted to run in races, and were mocked by Greeks because they were circumcised they found a way to pull their foreskin forward, and make it look like they were uncircumcised. But I didn't know of any cases of people who became circumcised and uncircumcised and and re-circumcised.
But in a case, a Samaritans conversion to Judaism, however, was viewed as tantamount to denying their identity as a Samaritan. It was it was viewed as being a traitor to one's people. For a Jew, like Philip, to invite Samaritans to follow a Jewish Messiah would also be viewed as something like a betrayal of Judaism. Because, hey, this, this is our Messiah. And you shouldn't be, you know, welcoming these people in so glibly. But it follows the theological program of decentralized witness that was argued in chapter 7, and was promoted by Jesus in chapter 1:8,
Chapter 8:13. Here we see a power encounter. Pagan sorcerers, sometimes could duplicate some of God's signs, you see that in Exodus 7: 11, 22, chapter 8:7. But there was a limit, you get to Exodus 8:18-19. You know, Pharaoh's magicians had never been able to duplicate the scale on which God was working. I mean, God owns the universe, God works in nature. You're not going to ever be able to duplicate that skill of creating another universe or something like that. But they get to the point, Exodus 8:18-19 and then further in chapter 9:11, where they can't do the things that Moses was doing it all. And in fact, they recognize this is the finger of God. Interestingly enough, in Luke 11, where Jesus talks about casting out demons, Jesus says, if I by the finger of God, in casting out demons, than the kingdom of God has come upon you come into your midst.
Many places in the world today, sorcerers are converted, because they see that God's power is really greater. Someone I know who graduated from Asbury seminary with a DMin has sent me some pictures and some reports of how sometimes in one year, they'll have 20, practitioners of witchcraft, who openly claimed that that's what they do, converted and baptized in just one section of Indonesia, where he's from. And we have reports like that from many parts of Africa, and elsewhere. One report from Southern Africa, a black South African evangelist of belief, among Zulus was preaching. And there was a witch doctor, practitioner of witchcraft, throw curses and things like that. But he, he was curious about what was going on. And he joined into the crowd. And he had all these charms woven into his hair. Well, the power of the Holy Spirit was so strong that you just passed out, he fell down flat. And when he regained consciousness, all of his hair had fallen out with all the charms, and he became a Christian and committed himself to Christ, I'm sure his hair grew back. But in any case, we have a number of power encounters taking place all over the world today. And I've experienced some of that. Not in the most pleasant ways, but I've seen seen God's victory, God's power is superior to the power of the evil one. And some people are more apt to walk into that and others I don't like going into those situations. But God is victorious.
Well, in verses 14 - 25, the remainder of this narrative, we learned about apostolic ratification of the Samaritan conversions. Now, I mentioned earlier talking about current debates about baptism, the Holy Spirit, that theologically the Spirit's work is one package, you see that in 2:38-39, although some people will say that what you have in 2:38-39, is that repenting and being baptized are the prerequisite and that the gift of the Spirit doesn't necessarily immediately follow. But I think it's probably a bit messier than that. I have a friend Dana McCain, who teaches in Nigeria, and I joined him teaching there for three summers, but he's been there for decades. And Danny talks about how he will he will assign members of the class different passages in the book of Acts. And they'll say, Well, what does receiving the Spirit look like in the book of Acts, and depending on the passage that they have, well, you get baptized first, then you receive the Spirit, or you receive the Spirit and then you get baptized or, you know, some of those may be exceptional. But the point is, God is sovereign. God isn't limited to doing it just one way there may be there may be an ideal pattern, but let God be God. In any case. In principle, we receive the spirit of conversion, but experientially we don't necessarily experience all aspects of it simultaneously. Scholars have approached this in various ways. Some people say, well, the Samaritans were not really converted yet. That is decided minority view. Among Acts commentators. However, most Acts commentators recognize they were converted. But this, at least this aspect of the Spirit's work they hadn't experienced yet. I think Calvin said they hadn't experienced the outward signs of the Spirit yet. However, you take it to something that that the apostles felt they needed to have, that they didn't have yet.
The biggest point here is that the Samaritans received the gift also. And the Jerusalem church recognizes and approves of that rat least their leaders do. Peter and John want this they want them to receive the Spirit. The Spirit according to Luke's emphasis, Acts 1:8 the spirit is powerful witness. Thus, Samaritans become partners in mission. Now, this is not what Jewish people normally expected. Most Jewish people, when they were going from Galilee to Jerusalem, if there were Galileans like Peter and John were, they would travel through Samaria. It was a three days journey. It was longer if you took a roundabout way some people did that. But but most Jewish people did travel through Samaria. And Samaritan sometimes mocked them as they were going to Jerusalem. And the story is told of this one Samaritan who was saying, why you're going up to Jerusalem. You know, Mount Gerizim, our holy mountain, is higher than Mount Zion. In fact, it's the only mountain that wasn't covered during the flood. And the rabbi didn't know what to say to him, but the rabbi's assistant who was who was his, his donkey driver, on which the rabbi was, was riding said, Well, according to the Torah, only the mountains of Ararat were not immersed. And the Samaritan was ashamed. And thereupon, according to the story, the rabbi got off his donkey and put the put his donkey driver, let his donkey driver ride it instead, because he was so adept in scripture.
But this had happened in Luke 9, where they were passing through Samaria. And the Samaritans were very displeased that they were heading towards Jerusalem. And Peter and John, that's not Peter and John, John, and James wanted to call down fire from heaven on the Samaritans, they wanted to act like Elijah. But they didn't understand really what God really wanted. God really cared about Samaria and well. John is performing a very different role at this point. But you can you can see things moving towards that. Also in Luke 17, where Jesus heals a number of lepers, and the only one that comes back to give thanks, is a Samaritan. And Jesus commends him. So they were learning some things and of course, we know from John 4, the the other dealings there. But in any case, this is a remarkable thing that they want Samaritans to receive the Spirit. This is definitely a change for the Galileans. It's a transition. They haven't gotten to Gentiles yet, but they're moving in the right direction.
Chapter 8:17. We have some rare Jewish examples of laying on hands for prayer. Of course, hands were laid on to impart blessings and prayer in the Old Testament, we talked about hands being laid on chapter 6, for the for the coming of the spirit for ministry, and Old Testament background for that. But laying on of hands for prayer in general, was not all that common. But here, Peter and John, who have laid hands on the seven earlier, including Philip, now lay hands on the Samaritans. The goal is not to keep the power for ourselves, or to keep knowledge for ourselves for that matter, or whatever else. The goal is to disseminate it to multiply it as much as possible, so that we have as many coworkers as possible but the harvest is great. The laborers are few. Let's seek to multiply it.
Chapter 8:18-24. Well, sorcerers worked signs and Simon sees something that lets him know that the people have received the Holy Spirit. Different views on what it may have been. Whether it was something like maybe when Stephen looks like an angel in 6:15 A lot of people think it's tongues because tongues appears elsewhere, but I think that Luke has such a heavy emphasis on cross cultural communication that he would love to narrate tongues if he knew for sure that it happened on this occasion. So, I'm inclined to think it probably wasn't tongues. But probably that's the majority of you of people that try to narrow down anything. James D. G. Dunn thinks it probably was tongues. Fitting Luke Acts, it could have been any kind of prophesying. Although again, Luke might have mentioned that if he if he knew exactly what it was, he may not have the details for this occasion. But whatever it was, it was something that Simon saw, he witnessed. And he said, I want that same power that these apostles have. Because, whoa, that's really dramatic. Well, sorcerers were used to buying magical formulas, and Simon, he wants to buy this power to impart the Holy Spirit. But no one could buy the spirit. This is God's gift. And there's no money in the world that would be enough to acquire God's gift worthily. We have to just accept it as is God's gift. We don't all have the same gifts. We just have to be faithful with the gifts we have. And open. If God wants to give us more gifts. But Simon took the wrong approach.
And the other Simon, Simon Peter says, you and your money, perish with you. So Simon asked them to pray for him. So it ends on a somewhat positive note, at least Simon realizes he's in trouble and he wants them to pray for him. And he acknowledges their right to be the ones to do this prayer. It doesn't say that he repented for himself and according to later tradition. He didn't. Justin Martyr and others, although you also have to keep in mind that the later church when they were dealing with false prophets of their own day, it helped if they had somebody they could link them to in the New Testament. And some of those false prophets actually wanted some precedents in the New Testament. There were other than the apostolic, public apostolic tradition. So we don't know for sure whether he historically repented or not. But Luke ends it on a fairly positive note, or at least he has the opportunity to do so.
In chapter 8:26-40, it moves to the conversion of an African official. By the way, Phillip functions as a forerunner, maybe not in the same way that John the Baptist does for Jesus. But Scott Spencer has pointed out that Philip often functions is forerunner for Peter in the book of Acts, because it's Philip, who preaches first to the Samaritans. Well, as there is the Peter and John are on their way back home, they preach to the Samaritans also, they've learned from something that Philip did before them. And they weren't too proud to do that. And they could preach in the villages of Samaritans, Philip being Hellenist, probably could only speak Greek. He could speak in the major town, a lot of the Samaritans there spoke Greek, but in the surrounding villages, they would just speak Aramaic. So Peter and John can preach in the villages in a way that Philip couldn't, unless he's with them, and they're translating for him. And the reverse might have been more likely.
But in any case, coming to verses 26 - 40, we learn about the conversion of an African official and this is significant. This is the first fully Gentile convert. Five times the narrative says that he's a eunuch, even though it might be more dramatic to say he's the treasurer of Queen Candace. The narrative keeps emphasizing that he's a eunuch. So it probably means it literally rather than just as an official, there were a number of officials in fact, in antiquity who were eunuchs male servants of queens were often eunuchs and he is the male servant of a queen. Now in the Roman world, it was despised people looked down on eunuchs, they considered them they called them often half men. It was understood that sometimes people were born with certain things missing, but especially when they most eunuchs were people who had been made eunuchs humanly by human means. This was sometimes done for servants who were male, so that they wouldn't enter puberty in the normal way, and could continue to be sexually abused by male masters. But especially it was associated with people from parts of the world where this was done like, like Parthia.
Well, if a person was literally a eunuch, according to Deuteronomy 23:1, this person could not become a proselyte. They could not join the community of Israel, they can be a God fearer. And this man obviously is I mean, he reads, he's reading from scripture, he's been to Jerusalem because he fears God. But he wouldn't be allowed to actually be a full proselyte. And he's the first fully Gentile Christian, the first fully Gentile Christian is from Africa, later on, because people today, you know, we call him the Ethiopian eunuch. And sometimes we think of the current nation of Ethiopia. And the nation of Ethiopia has a wonderful Christian history. In fact, they were converted through the witness of a couple of Syrian Christians. Around the year 333. The Emperor is Ezana, the emperor of the relatively new empire of Aksum and East Africa ad what's now Ethiopia, converted to Christianity, much of Ethiopia converted with him. It's one of the few places in the world where the gospel initially spread without martyrs.
But probably this court official is not from what we call Ethiopia today. Ethiopia had a wider meaning back then. And the mention of Candace lets us know that he was actually from the Nubian Kingdom of Meroe, which existed before Aksum did actually goes back to around 750 BCE. Well, how do we know that? That that he was he was that this conversion is so significant in terms of Luke's narrative. He's already mentioned a proselyte in chapter 6. We have Samaritans in the first part of chapter 8. Cornelius, is clearly a Gentile in chapter 10. And some people say, Well, he's the first Gentile convert. He's actually the first public Gentile convert. He's the one that the Jerusalem church knows about. But there were things happening before the things that became commonly and widely known. So, this is the first Gentile convert, Philip.
Remember Paul and his companions, including Luke, in Acts 21, they spend time in Phillip's home. Well, what the Philip and Paul be talking about when they're together, probably one of the things they'd be talking about would be old times when, when maybe Paul was still a persecutor, and had scattered the church. And then well, what did Philip do when he went out? And Luke may have been staying even with Philip, later on in Caesarea when Paul was in Roman custody there for up to two years. But he certainly would have had other occasions to talk with Philip whom he'd already met. Well, he would have heard this story. But this might be a story that only Philip knew it may there's no indication Philip went on to Caesarea. He didn't go back to Jerusalem. So this isn't something we're worried necessarily got back to the Jerusalem church. In contrast with the conversion, in Samaria I mean, that would have to get back to the Jerusalem church, you had travelers going back and forth. So word would have would have gotten there fairly quickly.
There's a message here, one that that Luke, undoubtedly finds very ideal to emphasize, in light of the Old Testament. Isaiah 56:3-5, we see that God Himself welcomes foreigners, and eunuchs. Well, here's a guy who's both of these. That's the context of the of the passage that Luke cites earlier, where Jesus cites from Isaiah 56 and says, His house should be called a house of prayer. The context is a house of prayer for all nations. Also, there's an Ethiopian eunuch in the Old Testament, who turns out to be one of Jeremiah's few allies and saves his life. He doesn't get as much play in the book of Acts as Cornelius does. The Cornelius story is repeated three times in the book of Acts. But that's because of Peter's role in that story. Cornelius was the first official convert. And one of the most important things about that story was not just the conversion of Cornelius, but the conversion of the Jerusalem church, the change in their thinking about what could happen.
Now, they were regarding that as an exception, rather than a precedent until you get to Acts 15. When Peter's listening to what's going on through Paul's ministry and cites, that is a precedent. But this conversion of Cornelius wasn't the first Gentile Christian, this African court official was the first Gentile Christian. Now Luke traces the mission of the church to the west, to the heart of his audiences empire. But that doesn't mean he doesn't care about the gospel going to the rest of the ends of the earth, and He narrates here are going to the southern ends of the earth.
And, you know, because he cares about going to the ends of the earth that will also include the East and the north. So this has given as much space as the Samaritan revival. And it may show us something significant too in terms of reaching out to international visitors who are in our midst. Some of these visitors are for places where it would be very hard to reach people in their own contexts where they're from. But if they, if they come into cities where we are able to minister on where there's more freedom to minister, by all means we should be reaching them. It's so tragic. I think that in some, in some countries where there's freedom to preach the gospel, you have people who are, we're not doing anything to reach the unreached. And God is sending often the unreached to them many of our cities have just a mixture of cultures. We need to be proactive and reaching out to people. I mean, it's it's their choice, how they respond. But we certainly need to be loving them, and sharing with them. And in this case, God certainly orchestrates the events.
In 8:26. Philip is told to go possibly south or possibly the Greek wording means midday, it actually can be translated either way. If it's mid day, if he's being sent at midday, that's very urgent because normally at midday a person would stay in the shade. Often for an hour or two hours. Shepherds would take their their flocks in the shade of trees, if possible. Carpenters, whatever kind of work people were doing, they'd stop it at midday, and they eat a light meal or take a siesta and sleep for a while. But more likely the term means go south, which is also interesting because it's the South Road, he said toward Gaza. Well what is he expecting to find on this road? Especially as it's apparently a deserted, either a deserted road or going toward old Gaza, deserted Gaza.
There were two major roads from near Jerusalem that led southward one lead through Hebron and into Idumea or Edom, the other went south and joined the coast road. The other one went south, but then joined the coast road before it reached Gaza, heading for Egypt. So this specifies which roads to take. And we have archaeologically we have Roman milestones is road marker showing where these words roads were. But he speaks of something deserted either a deserted road, or more likely deserted Gaza. There was old Gaza in new Gaza, the city had been rebuilt. The old Gaza was the deserted town, near the culturally Greek Ashkelon, Old Testament Ashkelon, and the new Gaza. After the revival in Samaria, the command to just go walking, where you don't know what's going to happen, that must appear absurd. Although you can think of Abraham being sent out or other things in the Old Testament must appear absurd.
God often tests his servants faith through apparently absurd commands. Moses leads his people that come up to the Yam Suph the sea, and he was told to stretch out his hand In his rod and part the sea that sounds like an absurd command. I Kings 17 Elijah is tells tells a widow in Zarephath well you prepare the food for me first. She said I just had enough I was going to prepare for myself and my son that we were going to die but she goes ahead and obeys it. II Kings 5 Naaman is told by Elisha's servant that he's to go and dip in the in the River Jordan he says are not Abana and Pharpar the rivers of Damascus better than this he's offended because he wanted Elijah to wave his hand over the leprosy or something but his servants are the ones who aren't too proud and they say, Look, if he'd asked you to do some great thing, wouldn't you have done it? So they persuade him to obey this absurd command? And he's he's cleansed, he's healed? Well, in the same way. Philip is given a fairly absurd command. But when God gives us a command, we should obey it.
8:27 Ethiopia, literally the Greek is Aithiopia. That was that was a Greek term for all of Africa, South of Egypt. It wasn't just what we call Ethiopia today, although if they thought of that would have been included. Mediterranean legends placed Ethiopia at the southern ends of the earth. And there were there were a number of myths about Ethiopia Memnon, who was a who was a mighty and valiant warrior, son of Eos, the dawn goddess or Andromeda, who was an Ethiopian princess who was rescued by Perseus in Greek mythology. They sometimes in Homer had spoke of the gods going and hanging out with Ethiopians, they were considered a very special group of people. The most commonly mentioned feature of Ethiopians or African south of Egypt, in Greek literature, was their black skin, and that's also in the Old Testament. Also, you have busts of them, statues of them, and elsewhere in the writings, it speaks of other features. It's just absolutely clear that this is talking about Africans south of Egypt. There had been Nubian empires since around 3000 BC. This particular Empire, he speaks of the Kingdom of Meroe as well. Meroe was a black Nubian Kingdom south of Egypt, in what is now the Sudan. And it had been around since 750 BC, its main cities were Meroe and Napata.
Now, eventually this empire fell about the about the time that it was being eclipsed by the the powerful East African Empire, Aksum. But the gospel spread again in Nubia. And in the fifth and sixth centuries, it became a major stronghold of Christianity. And in fact it remained a Christian stronghold for almost 1000 years. Eventually, because they couldn't get their own. They couldn't get priests with teaching, because the patriarch of Alexandria couldn't spare them and Ethiopia couldn't spare them. Eventually, they succumbed to invaders from the north, but they were able to stop them off for many centuries. So for most of history since this time, actually it was a Christian kingdom. But we don't really have apart from oral tradition, about Ethiopia we don't really have any anything concrete about what happened after this official went back. Probably he shared his faith, but we don't we just don't have any details.
That Kandake or Candice we sometimes say in English. Greeks thought of this as the title of the ruling Queen Mother. So according to Greek usage, probably this would have been not just a queen, but the ruling queen. But Africans probably use the title more widely, and not just for the Queen, who reigned when there was no king, but any sort of any sort of Queen one of them or queen, a queen mother, ruling queen mother actually beat Augustus he had to retreat And there are another a number of other ancient reports about these powerful Ethiopian queens. According to Jewish legend, Moses had married one. There was there was one ruling in this period, her name was Queen Nikante Qendeke. We don't know if this was the one or not, but that was one of the Queens, who actually was ruling Nubia, or ruling the empire of Meroe.
Nubian art, it portrays the queen with many jewels, and also depicts her wide girth, which means that she had a lot of food available that was considered a great thing in this culture. This was a powerful queen, whether she was reigning or whether she was married to husband was reigning, we don't know for sure. In this period, because we don't. The dates of the rulers of Meroe are not quite fixed yet in by archaeologists. But the Queen's treasurer would definitely be a powerful person because the Queen was very wealthy. And this was a very wealthy kingdom, archeologists have found considerable wealth in the ruins of Meroe, which was way further south than Egypt on the on the Nile.
Greek would be used and trade ties with Egypt, Meroe had many trade ties with the North. That's where Rome got many of its African substances if they wanted peacocks or anything, it normally came through Meroe and Greek was the language of the cities of Egypt by this period. Many of the comments people still spoke, what we call Coptic, but Greek would have been used for official things. And you know, the Nile. The Nile was very good for trade, because you could you could sail southward in the Nile, because of the wind or you could sail northward on the Nile because of the of the current. And this official undoubtedly spoke Greek since he was involved in economic issues for the kingdom, which is important because remember, Phillip, is Hellenist Greek is his language. So this is the common language in which they could communicate. It's probably also the language of the scroll that this official was reading, which he could have easily acquired. He could have acquired a Greek scroll even in Jerusalem, but probably acquired it most easily. In Alexandria, when he was on his way north.
Verse 28, he's in a chariot. Only the wealthiest people had chariots. People occasionally read sitting in expensive chariots. He might have been reading himself, undoubtedly he was literate he was a class that could afford education for sure. But he might have a reader who would be reading it to him. And presumably this is in Greek. Otherwise, there's no way that Philip would have recognized what text he was reading, verse 29, this the spirit is told Philip to run up to the chariot. And Philip is still a young man, apparently, he's in good, good health. Sometimes we see that positive aspect of youth in Scripture. Peter and John, Well, John, on my view, but different people have diffused Peter and the beloved disciple in John 20, kind of competing, who can run fastest to get to the tomb, and the beloved disciple outruns Peter and he remembers that. Peter swims to Jesus shows his devotion, lugging a bunch of fish in chapter 21. Well, Philip was young man, probably a young man. When we see him later in the book, he's, we don't know actually what age he is, but he has four virgin daughters. So probably, given what we know of the usual age of virgins, probably he was young man at this point.
And so, Philip, runs up to the chariot may not outrun it like Elijah outran Ahab's chariot, but he runs up to the chariot. Reading silently was very rare in antiquity. Not as some older commentators say that it never happened. It did happen sometimes. But usually, people read aloud. They hadn't developed, reading silently as a separate skill for the most part. He runs up to the chariot and here's the man reading from Isaiah. And the man says, for whom is the prophet speaking of himself, or someone else. Well, that's a divine setup. You have those sometimes in Scripture, like in Genesis 24, where Abraham sends his servant to find a wife for Isaac from his own household. And the details just fall into place and in ways that make the confirmation crystal clear, which is very important for the message of Genesis because the line must be carried on. So Genesis 24 is narrated at great length and the story is told at least twice as the servant narrates in detail to the family, to whom he comes how the Lord confirmed this for him. Well, probably most of you, if you've been followers of Jesus very long have experienced some of these divine setups. They happen. Well, I would say they happen fairly often. I've seen them happen. I've experienced them fairly often. But this one is a pretty dramatic one. It's very important that the good news be able to go even to this far off land farther and Philip can go farther and Philip's language abilities can take him. Here is a key moment.
Well, the text that's being read is from Isaiah 53. Now, who is the servant in the book of Isaiah? Well, sometimes Isaiah tells us in Isaiah 42, and some subsequent passages, the servant is explicitly Israel. So if anybody says, No, the servant can't be Israel, I'm sorry, but you're contradicting what the text explicitly says. In Isaiah 49, the servant is also Israel. But in 49:5, the servant seems to be distinguished from the rest of Israel and suffers on behalf of Israel. And then again, in chapter 53:1-3, the servant is rejected by Israel. And in 53:4-12. It says that the servant bears the sins of Israel, even though Isaiah has been talking about Israel being punished for her sins, chapter 40, double for her sins. And in Isaiah 53:9, it it says this servant is not guilty. And 53:12 This servant suffers voluntarily. That doesn't sound like it's describing Israel. It sounds like it's depicting somebody who acts on behalf of Israel, one person within Israel, a righteous remnant who acts on behalf of Israel. And, of course, this is applied in the New Testament to Jesus, who in retrospect, we can see is the one who fulfilled this.
In Acts 8:36-38. The going along, the man is so delighted. Well, he wasn't allowed to convert to Judaism. He couldn't as a eunuch. But now he's welcome. He can convert. There were wadis near Gaza, they come to a place where they say there's, there's water here what prevents me from being baptized? Full immersion was presupposed in Jewish baptism. So if a Gentile wanted to convert to Judaism, they would, they would be immersed in water. And in fact, normally, the immersion went much more immersively then, is practiced even in immersion, practicing churches today, in that the person normally had to be completely naked. Later rabbi said that if so much of a string of a bean was between your teeth, it invalidated the conversion, because you you weren't fully immersed. Now, I don't think that John the Baptist was immersing people in a river Jordan naked in a site where you've got men and women together, I don't think that's very likely knowing what we know about Judaism and abhorring nakedness, and so on, except in the case of executions. But, and so, you know, this may not have been a naked baptism, either.
But in any case, there's a wadi there, there's, they're able to do that. And as a God fearer, the Ethiopian probably understood the need for baptism, well, I can't be circumcised but at least I can, I can go through this ritual. Now, by the way, I'm not I'm not trying to get into the issue for what churches should do in a later period. I'm just explaining this as the background for how it was done then, you know. When you get to the Didache, you know, ideally, you should, you should be immersed in running water if you don't have running water than you use still water. It goes, it goes on down the way where you might have to pour if either, you know so. So that the most important thing was this was an act that was understood as an act of conversion. And how your church tradition does it based on whatever period they're looking at. I'm just talking about what it was here in the book of Acts based on how it was normally done in this period. But in Acts 8:39, the Spirit catches Philip away, and the Ethiopian doesn't see him anymore. But he goes on his way rejoicing, which is also a sign of the Spirit and Acts like in Acts 13, the end of the chapter, that the Spirit catches Philip away.
Now, it had been thought that a prophet could that could happen to Prophet in the Old Testament, like with Elijah Obadiah said, Oh, maybe, you know, I was afraid when you, you're telling me to go get Ahab. Nobody's been able to find you. You're so elusive. But what is hidden you? I'm just afraid I'll go tell Ahab and you won't be here, the Spirit will snatch you away and put you somewhere else or in second, which didn't happen in II Kings 2:16, some of the sons of the prophets say to Elisha, well, you know, we knew that your master would be taken from you today. So maybe, maybe the Spirit of the Lord is carried him away on some mountain or something, we need to go look for him. In Ezekiel 3:12-14, the Spirit actually does catch Ezekiel away. But it's not clear that it's in his body, or whether it's in a visionary way. He, you know, in one, he's actually picked up by his hair, and carried away in the spirit, but it's in the visions of God's, so was it literal or not?
But here, it's clearly real. And it's clearly physical. He's he's really relocated. And I've actually talked with people who have experienced that not very often, it's not very common in the New Testament, either we have it here, but and then in Revelation, depending on how you take that probably in a visionary way, that revelation. So and then Paul says, whether in the body or out, I don't know. But I have gotten reports of that. And there are reports of that. In Indonesia, some of the some of the ministry teams that they were walking, and something that should have taken a week and it only took them a day, or something like that. God has ways of doing those things if he wants to, but it's not very frequent. The African court official goes on his way. Phillip, however, the spirit carries him away and he starts going to the coastal cities, Azotus, which was the ancient Philistine stronghold of Ashdod. Azotus was the current name of the city. It was about 25 miles north of Gaza, or about 35 miles west of Jerusalem. He preaches in these in these cities until he comes to Caesarea, Caesarea Maritima is opposed to Caesarea of Philippi. What used to be known as Straton's Tower and then Herod renamed it in honor of Caesar. So in settled Jews there as well as other people.
So, Caesarea Maritima was over 50 miles north of Azotus, so over 70, 75 miles north of Gaza, and it's off the same coastal road. So Phillip is just walking on the main on the main road at this point. Now, it leaves Phillip here. It's going to come back to him later, and he's still going to be in Caesarea. So you know, there are different seasons in our lives. Philip was itinerant, at one point he is an evangelist. Here, Philip apparently settles and does ministry. In Caesarea. Caesarea is going to be very significant for this narrative. That's where Peter is going to share the gospel with Cornelius. Philip has already been there. But Peter, a leader in the Jerusalem church is the one who sent for because the Jerusalem church needs to learn some things too. Caesarea was more multicultural than Jerusalem. Jerusalem was pretty much monolithically Jewish. Caesarea was divided between Jews and Gentiles. And there wasn't a lot of interchange and there was also a lot of suspicion and mistrust. But Phillip is is going to settle there and presumably do ministry there. But that's where Peter is going to meet Cornelius in chapter 10.
But before chapter 10 is chapter 9, which is where Saul becomes a believer. And for a few chapters, it's going to be cutting back and forth transitioning gradually between Peter and the Jerusalem church on the one hand, and Paul and the Gentile mission on the other. Caesarea also was probably widely known because of the Judean Roman war. When war broke out, Jews and Syrians started massacring each other in the streets of Caesarea. And we're told by Josephus, that in a very short amount of time, the Syrians gained the upper hand and slaughtered around 20,000 Jewish residents of the city. So it was an awful thing. Although we're told by later church tradition, that Philip was no longer there, Philip in his in his four daughters had emigrated to Asia Minor, and were part of the Johannine related church there.
Phillip functions as Peter's forerunner here with the Samaritans, with the Gentiles, and even with Caesarea. Luke probably has the stories from Philip. Sometimes we have a lot of unsung heroes in history. Philip, we wouldn't have known about any of these things. If Luke had only had access to the the stories from the Jerusalem church. We have a lot of unsung heroes in church history. There are a lot of there's some of those of us who are out in front of people, there are people who know about us. But we've got people behind us who are praying for us. We have other other people that that you never hear of, who are doing ministry. You think of some some major evangelist, do you think of the people who lead them to the Lord, the people who led me to the Lord, who brought me the gospel on the street. When I was an atheist, and I argued with them for 45 minutes, and they didn't even find out that I was converted, until a year later, I tracked them down and made sure that that they got to know and by then I'd lead 10 other people to the Lord. But they people, I know their names, but most people have not heard of them. And most people most people have not heard of most of us, in fact. But our names are written down in heaven. They're written in the Lamb's book of life, as it says in Luke 10. And that's what matters most. God knows who we are. And we're all brothers and sisters, we'll all be together forever.
I remember one time, I was walking into a place of prayer, people were praying there, they were worshiping there. And I was so wrapped up in all the things I was doing for the Lord. And those were good things. And as I got into there, I felt like the Holy Spirit spoke to me, these are all good things, this ministry you're doing this ministry you're doing. But someday you won't be this, and you won't be that. But what you will always be is my child. And that's the heart of our identity. Whether people know who we are or not. Philip does the mission before Peter. And Philip doesn't get the same notoriety that Peter does. But God used Philip to break new ground. And God knows in God's book, and that's what matters, that God's work goes forth. We seek first the kingdom and everything else will be added to us. And in the end. It's the kingdom that matters, because that's what's forever.
Announcer - This is Dr. Craig Keener in his teaching on the book of Acts. This is session number 11 on Acts 8.